How strategic ambiguity can contribute to sustainability and innovation

In science and management it is a virtue to be truthful and fair. To be a good scientist or manager it requires decision making and communcation to be clear and specific. Ambiguity (that can be described as “not having a single clear meaning”) is not a term that seems to relate positively to this virtue. However there is a growing understanding that in situations where there are multiple and contradicting goals it might be more pragmatic to avoid being too clear and specific. Ambiguity can be useful to create common ground on sensitive topics or it can help in finding consensus on controversial topics or allows flexibility in crisis situations.

In strategic management there are several practices of ambiguity that can be identified to create more participation and commitment in complex situation, such as:

  • Equivocal language: by using vague words or removing complete details;
  • Inflation: where slightly exaggerated ideas are used;
  • Postponement: where controversions are left open;
  • Preservation of rights to participate in the future;
  • Equivocal commitment: when participants sign a commitment and can add conditions.

In working together with different stakeholders on sustainability and open innovation, strategic ambiguity can be a meaningful instrument to use. Strategic ambiguity is of course ambiguous as well as the term itself suggests, because it can also have negative effects. The lack of clarity can also reduce trust, especially where previously the management style was very clear and specific. Further it can lead to false consensus in decision making  leading to delayed tensions and even active resistance. Ambiguity should therefore be practiced in a responsible and ethical fashion.

 

Norbert Bol

Literature

Scandelius, C., & Cohen, G. (2016, in press, corrected proof). Achieving collaboration with diverse stakeholders—The role of strategic ambiguity in CSR communication. Journal of Business Research.

Photo credit: Nathan Gibbs Embracing Ambiguity, Flickr

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “How strategic ambiguity can contribute to sustainability and innovation

  1. I don’t feel strategy should be ambiguous in any way, shape or form. Certainly there needs to be an appreciation of the politics de jour but any strategy needs to be clear, focused and definitely unambiguous. This is not negotiable

    Liked by 1 person

    • Thanks Tim, I agree, but in certain circumstances where different stakeholders are involved there is a growing evidence in practice and science that ambiguity can be helpful. It is in my opinion not meant as a long term strategy.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s